The headline is incredibly misleading, to the borderline of being blatantly false. They’re not criticizing her for Top Bill Of Rights 01 Amendment shirt-funded use of a private jet, but for NOT using the jet and instead charging taxpayers for record low commercial coach tickets. They’re upset that she justified her personal purchase of the jet by saying it would save taxpayers (a ridiculous argument), then in practice actually saved taxpayer money by flying commercial. I’m no fan of Loeffler’s, but this is an extremely biased and poorly written damned if you do, damned if you don’t article where Loeffler actually did the better thing and they’re trying to spin it to be negative. Salon should be better than this. She flew commercial at least 2 dozen times, the issue with the coach vice business or above is due to the flu citation in ticket price this year due to the pandemic.
Top Bill Of Rights 01 Amendment shirt, Tank Top, V-neck, Sweatshirt and Hoodie





I misread Loeffler’s statements. She didn’t justify her purchase of the private jet by saying it saved taxpayer money. But justified her use of that jet. As mentioned in one of the comments. She actually would save taxpayer money as it couldn’t be expenses. Though the article states it’s less than $100 per flight. The article is trying to say that. She is a hypocrite for saying her use of the jet saves taxpayer money (a true statement. But she still flies coach instead of using that available option. The Top Bill Of Rights 01 Amendment shirt is those statements aren’t. Mutually exclusive, which is why implying it is a contradiction would be false. The salon is and always has been trash. This is the politics subreddit. They’ll let any garbage source on here as long as it continues the electioneering for democrats.
Other Product: Awesome Eat Sleep Anime Repeat Vintage Shirt
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.